#Canticle Updates · Lab Notes · 2026-07-11

current state / answer policy / measurement

SEAM — Where We Are

The semantic conversation adapter is implemented and verified. It expands SEAM's improvement loop beyond retrieval tuning into cross-turn evidence completion and bounded inference. The implementation is green; its benchmark effect remains deliberately unclaimed until a new measurement run.

The adapter exists. The score is still unclaimed.

HISTORY#382 · PR #142 · implementation and review complete · free survivor measurement next

BUILD GREEN MEASUREMENT OPEN
╭─ state spine ─╮

How the current state was reached

measurement
integrity
judge/2
contract
offline
adjudication
adapter
implemented
survivor
measurement
╭─ current project goal ─╮

Product-correct cat1 and cat3 improvement

Raise both categories to at least 0.80 through behavior that improves the product, not by teaching the answerer to guess benchmark labels.

0.80cat1 floor
0.80cat3 floor
2score views

Raw benchmark scores remain visible. Adjudicated results are reported separately and may never conceal a raw regression.

╭─ delivery state ─╮

What is complete right now

Semantic conversation adapterDONE
Category-floor selectionDONE
Raw + adjudicated reportingDONE
Review and CIGREEN
New score measurementOPEN
╭─ score truth ─╮

Last measured judge/2 values vs target

cat1
0.705
cat3
0.405

│ target = 0.800

NO NEW SCORE CLAIM

PR #142 made no benchmark generation or provider call. These values predate the implementation and remain the latest measured truth.

╭─ opportunity ceiling ─╮

Offline adjudication

0.779cat1 confirmed
0.803cat1 + mixed
0.690cat3 defensible

Opportunity ceilings describe the reviewed failure set. They are not newly measured runtime scores.

╭─ cat1 failure landscape ─╮

29 reviewed non-correct cases

judge/gold
13
answerer
8
retrieval
5
mixed
3
measurementgenerationretrieval
╭─ cat3 failure landscape ─╮

14 reviewed inference targets

defective
8
defensible
6

Safe inference alone cannot honestly reach the raw target. Eight expected answers were judged defective or underspecified; six were defensible high-confidence inference targets.

╭─ top code notes ─╮

What landed in the semantic conversation slice

conversation/1

Projects retrieved turns into a readable evidence view with stable rows while preserving the default path when disabled.

set-completion

Scans across turns, resolves aliases and pronouns, deduplicates facts, and validates requested counts before synthesis.

inference/high-confidence/1

Allows bounded world-knowledge inference only when one interpretation is well supported; ambiguity still requires abstention.

raw + adjudicated views

Emits both views from one scorer execution. Raw regressions remain promotion blockers instead of being hidden by correction.

fair comparator policy

SEAM, Mem0, and Zep can receive the same opt-in answer policy so a comparison still isolates memory-system behavior.

category-floor progress

The improvement loop can select changes that move cat1 or cat3 toward 0.80 even when an aggregate delta is small.

╭─ bugs found and fixed ─╮

Review caught three boundary defects

FIXED · policy coupling

Inference-only candidates no longer accidentally enable cat1 set-completion behavior.

FIXED · overlay integrity

Adjudication overlays now fail closed when they name a case absent from the raw report.

FIXED · floor validation

CLI category floors must be numeric values inside the inclusive [0,1] range.

Final committed-diff review: zero findings · thread audit: zero unresolved threads.

╭─ PR #142 ─╮

Semantic conversation answer policy

agent/cat13-semantic-conversation-adapter

DRAFT · CLEAN

Head f69bf60 · implementation, review fixes, HISTORY#382, handoff, derived streams, and snapshot closeout.

Required CIPASS
Ubuntu advisoryPASS
Windows advisoryPASS
CodeRabbit0 FINDINGS
╭─ tests ─╮

Canonical verification

1,337collected
0fail / error / skip

Two established expected failures remain explicitly marked as xfail.

╭─ adapters ─╮

External pgvector

7/7passed
PASSintegration CI

Validated against the existing healthy service; no service lifecycle change was made.

╭─ continuity ─╮

Repo state

History and handoffPASS
Routing and streamsPASS
SnapshotVERIFIED
╭─ what happens next ─╮

The next evidence-producing steps

  1. Review and merge PR #142 when the operator is satisfied with the product boundary.
  2. Run the free survivor/dev measurement against the opt-in policies.
  3. Compare raw and adjudicated category movement without conflating the two.
  4. Identify which failure classes actually changed and which remained structural.
  5. Authorize a paid run only if the free evidence justifies the cost.
╭─ public reporting boundary ─╮

What this page may and may not expose

PUBLIC-SAFE

  • Aggregate scores and counts
  • Architecture summaries
  • PR status and test totals
  • Public next actions

NEVER EMIT

  • Private case text or tables
  • Local paths or credentials
  • Provider responses or hidden reasoning
  • Private session links or raw history
╭─ provenance ─╮

Evidence behind this report

Current-state recordHISTORY#382
Implementation reviewPR #142 · f69bf60
Score basisJUDGE/2 + OFFLINE AGGREGATES
Implementation spend$0.00
Claim boundaryNO NEW BENCHMARK SCORE